Random thought today: Forest Fires and Air National Guard

The US Air National Guard should consider standardizing the use of the Air Tractor AT-802 as a versatile platform. This aircraft could serve multiple roles, such as firefighting and search and rescue during peacetime, as well as armed reconnaissance, close air support, or ground attack during wartime. Originally designed as a crop duster, the AT-802 has evolved into various variants, thanks to its tough and reliable airframe. Most notably, it has been adopted by SOCOM as the Skywarden for armed reconnaissance. Adopting this platform in a standard configuration would allow highly trained pilots to maintain valuable skills that are applicable both at home and in combat scenarios.

The ongoing forest fires underscore the potential value of having assets like the AT-802 in the Air National Guard’s arsenal. In the face of such natural disasters, the Guard could effectively deploy a fleet of these aircraft to “battle” the fires, providing a critical resource for the nation. Critics may argue that propeller-driven planes like the AT-802 are ineffective against near-peer adversaries in wartime, but these planes would still be invaluable in missions that don’t require advanced aircraft. Their rugged design and lower cost make them suitable for many military operations where high-tech solutions aren’t necessary.

As the focus increasingly shifts toward expensive next-generation aircraft, the AT-802 presents a practical solution for emergency missions at home and offers a cost-effective alternative for certain military roles. Its adoption could help stretch budgets while addressing various needs effectively.

To my friends in the Libertarian Party

The constant negativity among my friends in the Libertarian Party has become a troubling trend that is doing more harm than good. While it’s understandable to have frustrations and concerns, this persistent culture of pessimism is not only unhelpful but also counterproductive. It undermines the party’s goals, alienates potential supporters, and demoralizes its own members. It’s time we recognize this pattern for what it is and commit to replacing it with a culture of optimism, constructive action, and determination.

No one is denying that there are serious problems within the Party. These concerns are real and valid. However, the way they are being communicated is where the breakdown occurs. Instead of offering solutions or working toward meaningful change, too often these frustrations are expressed in a way that feels directionless and counterproductive. Pointing out problems without presenting a plan for fixing them serves little purpose beyond venting. Worse still, this negativity is frequently injected into conversations where it does not belong. Shoe-horning grievances into unrelated topics doesn’t amplify the message; it dilutes it, alienating both allies and neutral observers who might otherwise be receptive to the party’s ideas.

The consequences of this negativity are significant. For starters, it drains the morale of party members. When people feel surrounded by pessimism, it’s hard to remain motivated or hopeful. If the message they constantly hear is that the Libertarian Party is broken, hopeless, or failing, why would anyone want to invest their time, energy, or support into it? This environment doesn’t inspire action; it fosters apathy and resignation. Those who might otherwise step up and contribute may instead step back, discouraged by the rhetoric and unsure of where to focus their efforts.

Negativity also alienates neutral individuals or those who are still forming their opinions. Whether at events, in conversations, or on social media, a barrage of complaints and criticism does not make the party look like a viable or inspiring option. Instead, it creates the impression of disarray, further reinforcing skepticism from outsiders. Worse still, this kind of rhetoric strengthens opposition. When we air our frustrations in such an unproductive way, we make it easier for opponents to dismiss us. They don’t need to challenge our ideas or values because we’re already doing the work of undermining ourselves.

So how do we change this? First, we need to shift our mindset. It’s time to replace this culture of pessimism with a culture of optimism and action. Optimism does not mean ignoring problems or pretending everything is fine. Instead, it means recognizing challenges while maintaining faith that meaningful change is possible. Optimism is what motivates people to roll up their sleeves and get to work. It inspires confidence, attracts supporters, and creates momentum. If we want to see progress, we need to believe that it can happen—and then take the steps to make it happen.

This leads to the second point: we need to focus on solutions, not just problems. When you identify an issue within the party, don’t stop there. Think about what can be done to fix it. Communicate your concerns in a way that is constructive and actionable. Offer ideas, propose strategies, and be willing to collaborate with others to implement them. Complaints on their own may spark frustration, but solutions inspire action. The more we focus on building pathways forward, the more energy we’ll create for real change.

Finally, we need to put in the work. Talking about change is not enough—action is required. There is so much work to be done within the Libertarian Party, from local organizing to outreach, education, and advocacy. Instead of sitting on the sidelines and complaining, we need to dig in and commit to the work. If we truly care about the issues we’re raising, then we need to step up and be part of the solution. Change doesn’t happen overnight, but it doesn’t happen at all if we don’t take that first step.

It’s time to ask ourselves: What kind of party do we want to be? Do we want to be known for our constant infighting and complaints, or do we want to be a party that inspires people with a vision for change? Do we want to push people away with negativity, or do we want to attract supporters with a message of hope, determination, and progress?

We have a choice to make. The problems we face are real, but so are the opportunities before us. We can sit back and complain, or we can rise up and work for the change we want to see. Let’s choose optimism. Let’s choose action. Let’s be the agents of change our party, and our principles, deserve.

 

Voice and SMS insecure by design

In an era dominated by digital communication, the convenience of voice calls and SMS (Short Message Service) often overshadows their glaring security vulnerabilities. Despite their widespread use, these traditional communication methods were never designed with modern security challenges in mind. As cyber threats and surveillance intensify, the need for secure alternatives like Signal and other encrypted messaging platforms has become increasingly evident.

Why Voice and SMS Are Insecure

  1. Lack of Encryption: SMS messages and standard voice calls operate over protocols that lack end-to-end encryption. This means that your communications can be intercepted and read by third parties, such as hackers, malicious insiders, or even network operators. In contrast, encrypted platforms use advanced protocols to ensure that only the intended recipient can access the content.
  2. Susceptibility to Interception: SMS messages are transmitted in plain text, making them vulnerable to interception via sophisticated tools or techniques like SS7 (Signaling System No. 7) exploitation. SS7, a protocol used by telecom providers to route calls and texts, has well-documented security flaws that attackers can exploit to eavesdrop on calls or intercept text messages.
  3. Reliance on Phone Numbers: Both SMS and voice calls rely on phone numbers, which can easily be spoofed or hijacked. SIM swapping, a common attack, enables fraudsters to take control of a victim’s phone number, granting them access to sensitive information like two-factor authentication (2FA) codes.
  4. Data Retention by Providers: Telecom companies often store records of SMS messages and call metadata, such as timestamps and participants, for extended periods. These records can be accessed by unauthorized entities, whether through hacking, legal demands, or internal misuse.
  5. Incompatibility with Modern Security Practices: Traditional phone systems lack advanced features like forward secrecy, which ensures that past communications remain secure even if encryption keys are compromised in the future. This shortfall leaves voice and SMS communications inherently vulnerable to retrospective attacks.

The Case for Encrypted Messaging

Encrypted messaging platforms, such as Signal, WhatsApp, and Telegram (when using secret chats), offer robust security features designed to protect user communications in the modern digital landscape. Here’s why these platforms are superior:

  1. End-to-End Encryption: With end-to-end encryption, only the sender and recipient can access the communication content. Even the service provider cannot read messages or listen to calls.
  2. Minimized Metadata: Platforms like Signal prioritize user privacy by minimizing the collection of metadata—the data about your communication, such as who you contact and when. This reduces the risk of surveillance and profiling.
  3. Enhanced Authentication: Encrypted messaging apps often provide additional security features, such as safety numbers or QR code verifications, to ensure that you are communicating with the intended recipient and not an imposter.
  4. Resistance to SIM Swapping: These platforms decouple identity from phone numbers by using unique identifiers or alternative authentication methods, reducing the risk of SIM swap attacks.
  5. Open-Source Code: Many secure messaging apps, including Signal, are open source. This transparency allows security experts to audit the code for vulnerabilities, ensuring robust protection against emerging threats.

While voice calls and SMS may seem convenient, their inherent vulnerabilities make them ill-suited for secure communication in today’s threat landscape. By adopting encrypted messaging platforms like Signal, individuals can safeguard their personal information and maintain privacy in an increasingly connected world. Making the switch is not just a step toward better security; it is an essential measure to protect our fundamental right to private communication.