Politics

By Choice, Not by Force: Why Many Latter-day Saints Embrace Libertarian Principles

Faith and Freedom Intertwined

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints teaches that agency—the God-given ability to choose between good and evil—is central to His plan for humanity. This belief shapes not only personal morality but also perspectives on how societies should be governed. For many Latter-day Saints, the principle of agency naturally leads to a preference for political philosophies that maximize individual liberty and minimize coercion. This is why many members find common ground with Libertarian principles, which seek to protect life, liberty, and property while leaving people free to choose their own paths.


Agency: A Divine Gift and Sacred Responsibility

From the very beginning, LDS doctrine emphasizes agency as essential to God’s plan. The Book of Mormon teaches that “men are free according to the flesh… to choose liberty and eternal life… or to choose captivity and death” (2 Nephi 2:27). This freedom to choose is not an incidental blessing; it is the foundation upon which moral growth is built.

The LDS narrative of the War in Heaven is a profound allegory for the value of liberty. In that pre-mortal realm, we are taught that Lucifer proposed a plan to force all souls to choose righteousness, removing the possibility of sin—but also removing agency. The Father rejected this plan, knowing that without freedom, righteousness would be meaningless. Libertarianism echoes this truth: virtue cannot be mandated; it must be chosen.


Accountability: Freedom’s Counterpart

In LDS theology, agency is always paired with accountability. Doctrine and Covenants 101:78 declares that God ordained “that every man may be accountable for his own sins in the day of judgment.” Freedom is not a license to harm others—it is the opportunity to act, coupled with the responsibility to bear the consequences of those actions.

Libertarianism shares this view. It champions a system where individuals may live as they choose, so long as they do not infringe upon the rights of others. Just as the gospel rejects the idea that we can outsource our moral duties to someone else, libertarian thought rejects the idea that a government can make us virtuous through compulsion.


The Proper Role of Government

Many Latter-day Saints believe that the U.S. Constitution was divinely inspired, as stated in Doctrine and Covenants 101:80. Its principles of limited government and individual rights align closely with libertarian ideals. The proper role of government, from this perspective, is to protect citizens from force and fraud—not to direct every aspect of their lives.

LDS history itself provides sobering lessons about government overreach. The persecution of the Saints in Missouri and Illinois—often carried out by state authorities—illustrates the dangers of concentrated political power. These experiences foster a deep appreciation for the need to keep government powers in check.


Voluntary Charity Over Coerced Redistribution

Service and charity are hallmarks of LDS life, but they are meaningful precisely because they are voluntary. Latter-day Saints donate to the Church’s welfare program, participate in humanitarian projects, and perform countless acts of service—not because the government requires it, but because love and compassion move them to act.

Libertarians hold that genuine charity cannot be legislated. While a government can take resources through taxation and redistribute them, it cannot create the spiritual and emotional bonds formed when people freely choose to help one another. Voluntary giving respects both the giver’s agency and the dignity of the recipient.


Acknowledging Differences

Of course, not all Latter-day Saints identify as Libertarians. Some believe government programs can be a tool for compassion or moral order. But even in these cases, the LDS principle of persuasion over compulsion offers common ground. As Doctrine and Covenants 121:41 teaches, power should be maintained “only by persuasion, by long-suffering, by gentleness and meekness, and by love unfeigned”—principles as valuable in politics as they are in ministry.


Preserving the Gift

Agency is more than a theological concept; it is a stewardship. Preserving the freedom to choose is a responsibility that extends beyond personal life into the civic sphere. For many Latter-day Saints, Libertarianism offers a framework for protecting that sacred gift—ensuring that choices, whether moral or mundane, remain in the hands of individuals rather than distant authorities.

In the end, God’s plan is carried out not by force, but by choice. And it is through protecting that choice—in law, in governance, and in daily life—that we safeguard both liberty and the opportunity for righteousness.

By Choice, Not by Force: Why Many Latter-day Saints Embrace Libertarian Principles Read Post »

Now Is the Time to Join the Libertarian Party

In a time of deep political disillusionment, Americans are increasingly waking up to a hard truth: neither of the major parties is serious about protecting your freedoms, your wallet, or your future. The promises made by Republicans under Donald Trump have too often rung hollow, while Democrats continue to double down on bloated bureaucracy and overreaching government control. If you believe in liberty, limited government, and personal responsibility, then now is the time to act. Now is the time to join the Libertarian Party.

Broken Promises and Bloated Government

Donald Trump campaigned on a platform of shrinking government, restoring liberty, and draining the swamp. Yet the federal deficit has exploded, federal surveillance powers have remained intact, and cronyism has flourished. Executive overreach has expanded under the guise of national emergency declarations, and meaningful reforms to the Patriot Act, civil asset forfeiture, and federal spending have been left by the wayside. For all the rhetoric, the federal government has grown more intrusive and more expensive.

On the other side, the Democratic Party offers no reprieve. Their vision for America is one of ever-expanding federal control—more regulations, more taxes, more programs, and less freedom. Whether it’s through sweeping surveillance programs, unending wars, or inflation-inducing spending sprees, their solutions always amount to more government in your life and less control in your hands.

The Libertarian Alternative

The Libertarian Party offers a clear alternative. We believe in your right to live your life free from government interference. We believe that your body, your property, and your choices belong to you—not to politicians, bureaucrats, or party bosses.

But belief alone isn’t enough. To take on the entrenched power of the duopoly, we need to grow. That means increasing our membership, raising funds, and building a national infrastructure capable of running competitive campaigns from city council to Congress. Every new member strengthens our voice and expands our ability to fight for liberty at every level.

Why Now?

We are standing at a critical juncture. As the two old parties continue to consolidate power and trample individual rights, the appetite for a real alternative has never been greater. Americans are hungry for something new—something principled, consistent, and accountable.

But without your support, that hunger will go unanswered.

If you’re tired of broken promises, if you’re fed up with big government from both the left and the right, and if you’re ready to make a real impact, then it’s time to stand with the Libertarian Party.

Join Us Today

Your voice matters. Your vote matters. But your membership matters even more.

By joining the Libertarian Party today, you send a powerful message: You will not be ignored. You will not be silenced. And you will not wait for liberty to be handed to you by the very parties that keep taking it away.

Join now and be a part of building a freer future:

👉 lp.org/darrdonor

Liberty won’t defend itself. Let’s do it together.

Now Is the Time to Join the Libertarian Party Read Post »

This Memorial Day, Let’s Honor the Fallen by Ending Their Wars: Repeal the 1957, 1991, 2001, and 2002 AUMFs

As Memorial Day approaches, we reflect not only on the ultimate sacrifice made by those who gave their lives in service to our country, but also on how we, as a nation, choose to honor that sacrifice. One of the most profound ways we can do so is by ensuring that war is never waged lightly, and only with clear, current, and constitutional justification. Yet several outdated Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs) remain in effect—giving the executive branch sweeping authority to engage in military action without updated congressional approval. The 1957, 1991, 2001, and 2002 AUMFs continue to grant expansive war powers long after their original purposes have faded.

If we are serious about honoring the fallen this Memorial Day, we must repeal these obsolete authorizations. Doing so will help restore constitutional checks on executive war powers and ensure that future military action is only undertaken with legitimate, narrowly defined congressional consent.

The Legacy of the AUMFs

  • The 1957 AUMF: Enacted during the Cold War, this authorization gave the president broad power to confront potential Soviet aggression in the Middle East. Though the Cold War ended decades ago, this AUMF remains technically active—despite being irrelevant to modern security challenges.

  • The 1991 AUMF: This resolution authorized the use of force to drive Iraqi troops from Kuwait during the Gulf War. That war concluded over thirty years ago, and Saddam Hussein’s regime no longer exists—yet the law authorizing that war still stands.

  • The 2001 AUMF: Passed in the days following the 9/11 attacks, this authorization granted the president power to target those responsible and their affiliates. Its vague language has allowed four successive presidents to use it to justify military operations in dozens of countries, far beyond its original scope.

  • The 2002 AUMF: Intended to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the removal of Saddam Hussein, this authorization continues to be used today for military actions unrelated to its initial objective. Both the Trump and Biden administrations invoked it for operations well outside Iraq.

Why Repeal Is Essential

Restoring Constitutional Balance
The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the sole power to declare war, a safeguard meant to prevent unilateral military action. But these lingering AUMFs have allowed the executive branch to bypass that requirement. Repealing them would reestablish congressional oversight and ensure that any new war powers are debated and approved by the people’s representatives.

Preventing Endless War
The 2001 and 2002 AUMFs have become tools for perpetual conflict. Their continued existence enables the United States to maintain a state of near-constant warfare. Repealing them would signal a commitment to ending open-ended military engagements and prioritizing diplomacy over force. Many veterans of these conflicts have spoken out about the toll of endless war; we owe it to those who never returned to ensure that such wars are not waged without clear purpose.

Honoring the Fallen with Action, Not Just Words
Memorial Day is more than a ceremony—it’s a call to remember and learn from our past. We honor the dead not only by commemorating them but by making sure their sacrifice was not in vain. Outdated AUMFs risk repeating mistakes that have cost thousands of lives. By removing these blank checks for war, we make a solemn promise that future lives will only be placed on the line with full, transparent, and necessary justification.

Modernizing Military Policy
The world has changed dramatically since 1957, 1991, 2001, and 2002. The threats we face today require new thinking and new strategies. Holding onto old war authorizations does not make us safer—it makes us reactive, not proactive. When new threats arise, Congress should consider new, narrowly tailored authorizations instead of relying on decades-old mandates.

A Path Forward

There is bipartisan recognition that these AUMFs no longer serve a valid purpose. In 2021, the House passed a bill to repeal the 2002 AUMF, and there have been continued discussions about repealing or revising the 2001 authorization. But much more work remains to be done.

This Memorial Day, let us do more than offer tributes. Let us act. Repealing outdated AUMFs is a step toward ensuring that those who made the ultimate sacrifice are honored by a government that treats war as a last resort—not a lingering policy.

Let their legacy be one of peace, accountability, and constitutional fidelity. Let us honor the fallen not just with flags and flowers—but with action.

This Memorial Day, Let’s Honor the Fallen by Ending Their Wars: Repeal the 1957, 1991, 2001, and 2002 AUMFs Read Post »